Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Obligatory Hunger Games Post


Disclaimer - I have not read the Hunger Games; I only know the very basics of the plot.  Unless you are living in a mine, you know the gist of the story as well:  kids forced to kill kids in a game or sport run by the government.  The child participants are chosen by lottery.  The citizens of the country in the book are generally entertained by all this, almost American Idol style.

I recently quoted blogger Joy Miladin on my Facebook page:

The Hunger Games is not an alarming prospect of what our nation could become; it is a piercing reflection of the current state of our society.”

Some people “liked” my status, even though a few of them would not agree with all of my reasons for seeing the parallel between the HG world and our own.  Regardless of why anyone sees truth in Miladin’s statement, I think all of us who “like” the quote agree acknowledging we are the same people as those in the Hunger Games is important.  We are not so much more educated and evolved than the people who make up the society in that story, and the country we inhabit is not a gaping chasm away from the one they inhabit.  In fact, currently, the two worlds are juxtaposed one on top of the other.  Someday in the future, near or far, if the light switch is flicked and we ARE literally killing each other in government-sponsored games for sport it will be obvious that was the case.

One person did respond incredulously to Miladin’s quote in my Facebook status, though.  What in the world did I mean by posting that statement?  I am sure there were also others on FB who shared the incredulity but did not comment, so the following is my answer to anyone who is interested.  It turned out to be a little too long for a Facebook comment, so here I am blogging about the Hunger Games instead of what I had planned (fish tanks of all things):

Whenever I read a fictional work about a dystopian future, I always ponder how this happens.  How do these societies get there.  More importantly, how have things like these happened in reality, in our world’s history?  How dystopian was rich and educated Rome before it fell?  Ask the babies they would throw off cliffs for being the wrong sex or too disabled or too inconvenient.  Ask the gladiators who were killed surrounded by cheering crowds.  Wasn’t Nazi Germany –not even a mere 80 years ago-- a dystopia if ever there was one?  Could many Germans a few decades before the ovens and gas chambers have possibly imagined themselves and their country taking part in something so monstrous as the extermination of millions of innocent people?  The type of dystopia depicted in the Hunger Games would not be so horrifying if it were not possible, if it did not in fact happen over and over again in reality.  It’s horrifying because it rings true.

It seems to me in most if not all cases these historical dystopias do not simply appear like a thief in the night; they are gradually ushered in –welcomed, even—by almost everyone without us truly being aware of the consequences of starting our society along a certain path.  The process speeds up rapidly at some point and becomes obvious, but only after much has been willingly given up by a complacent citizenry:  acknowledgement of various natural, unchangeable human rights; belief in universal truths; empathy; personal responsibility, etc.  The relinquishment of these things happens over time either out of a decadent and misguided desire for yet more license (i.e. false freedom) or out of the desperation that can be generated by hard economic times which can spur people to give up rights and power to a central government in hopes of being saved.  Often, I think, it’s a combination of those reasons, not just one or the other.  Those on the top want to do whatever feels right to them at any time (please note:  “on the top” in America is just about everybody –certainly all of us reading a blog!-- considering even those at America’s poverty level have far more material wealth than those at poverty level in any other country); meanwhile, those on the bottom of the financial rungs want simply to give whoever is in power more power in hopes that powerful people will rid them of their financial nightmares so their struggles can end.  (Note, too:  struggling never ends.)  Whichever reason for society’s steps in that direction, they all lead to the same destination.  And, here we are.

I recently read an article by Peggy Noonan in the Wall Street Journal that sheds yet more light on where we are as a nation in our dystopia.  It takes many small, willing steps over time on the part of a society to get to a place where it is acceptable to a segment of the citizenry to watch a person get beaten, stripped and robbed as we stand around laughing and recording it rather than helping, as in this article.  Yet, that is a fairly regular type of occurrence and a more common attitude now.  Scenarios like the ones mentioned in the article are not simply more and more reported these days; they are more frequent.  Our pop culture revels in it, in fact, all the way down to something as “benign” as reality TV.  We even enjoy doling out ridicule at the stars of those shows; it’s what we do.  It’s “harmless.”  Does anyone really think Snooki is cool?  No, everyone is simply laughing at her.  And she is laughing at us, too, all the way to the bank, all the while living the new American dream of unlimited license.  A 19-year-old shoots and kills nine people (including himself) at the Westroads Mall while people are Christmas shopping.  Instead of a mournful song about it, we get a peppy little ditty called "Pumped Up Kicks" that some middle school kids can’t get enough of at their school functions where they pornfully dance as chaperones look the other way.  The responsibilities we give up, the heart we give up, are a void passed down to the next generation and the next.  The members of those generations are left with empty space where virtue and love should have been, Lewis's "men without chests."

You may say to yourself, “Well, in Hunger Games, the government is forcing the kids to take part in this carnage.  At least we are not at that point.”  To which I would say:  isn’t that just about the scariest prospect?  You have kids shooting other kids in school of their own volition.  Isn’t that worse than being forced into it?  “Well, at least the government hasn’t made a game show where people laugh at and mock those who are being beaten and robbed.”  No, we’re choosing to do that all on our own on YouTube!  “Well, at least the government isn’t sanctioning looting of American businesses.”  No, we’re choosing to flash mob all on our own!  “Well, at least the government isn’t drugging us to make us docile.”  No, we’re choosing to do that all on our own with one of the most popular college majors being Getting As Close As Possible to Alcohol Poisoning Each Week Without Quite Dying.  “Well, at least this isn’t like China, where women are forced to abort their babies because of the one child rule.”  No, we’re choosing to abort them all on our own!  We, the people!

Simultaneously with individual and societal declines and shallowings, there is of course a slow and seemingly inexorable march towards a totalitarian state, like the world of the Hunger Games.  As we continue to march, we will simply be passing more and more of the “burden” of some of these choices to central government officials.  But to me that’s far less of a big deal than the fact that we’re making those choices at all in the first place, calling evil actions tolerable or even good.  In large part, we get the government we ask for; an actual totalitarian government forcing its choices on us would not be a newsflash.  This is:

The Hunger Games are here and now.  And we’re too proud and sophisticated to care.